Support independent journalism in Central & Eastern Europe.
Donate to TOL!

× Learn more
No, thanks Photo: Abbas Atilay
 
back  |  printBookmark and Share

Farce and Tragedy in Donetsk

While Western leaders make the usual threatening noises, Russian media present the Donetsk 'referendum' as legitimate, Kyiv as murderous, and the West as collaborating with fascists. by Halya Coynash 12 May 2014

It was all for the cameras Sunday. EU countries got a chance to condemn a farcical pseudo-referendum in which people could vote on behalf of others and in which not living in the region was no impediment. They could even sound firm while doing nothing more than threatening more sanctions if the 25 May presidential election cannot be held. 

 

And Russians, as well as the many Ukrainian viewers of Russian TV channels, learned that “according to the CEC 89.7 percent of voters voted for the independence of the Donetsk region” and that the turnout was over 74 percent. They were also told, and apparently shown footage, “proving” that Ukrainian National Guard members shot at civilians in Krasnoarmeisk, killing at least one man. It is by no means clear who carried out the shooting, but that, of course, is not mentioned. 

 

A sign on a polling station proclaims the Donetsk Republic. Image from a video by Voice of America.

 

The West’s reputation among the Russian media’s audience is, in short, mud. 

 

Not so Russian President Vladimir Putin’s image. He, after all “called on” the pro-Russian militants to postpone their referendum and was ignored. That’s a double win for him.  He can use it as “proof” that the militants aren’t under his control and that the referendum had nothing to do with him. 

 

Meanwhile all Russian TV channels loyal to and/or funded by the Kremlin were unanimous in finding the event legitimate and decisive.

 

All of those media spoke of the Central Election Commission in headlines and only occasionally mentioned that the body in question was that of the “Donetsk People’s Republic.” Since the so-called referendum was on whether there should even be such a place, it can hardly be administered and overseen by the “republic’s” election commission.

 

This is no quibble over terminology. Ukraine’s Central Election Commission condemned the event on 11 May as illegal and unconstitutional. This was reiterated by all major election watchdogs. The Luhansk Regional Committee of Voters of Ukraine [CVU] was, in fact, present, however its figures for the turnout in Alchevsk, the one city where it found that the voting had been sufficiently transparent to enable any estimate, was 50 to 60 percent. CVU “observers” tried to vote in various places. In Rubezhnoye the lack of a passport was no problem at all, with a fictitious address and passport number being added to the supplementary list. Nor did being from Lviv prevent a person from voting. In Kremennaya the observer asked for an extra ballot paper for her sister. It was issued, again with the address and passport number simply invented. 

 

None of this, of course, is seen on Russian TV, where the process looks impeccable. After quoting the head of “the CEC,” LifeNews is told by Mikhail Polyakov, described as the federal coordinator of the observer corps, “For fair elections,” that “the high turnout demonstrates the huge interest to the given referendum and the lack of coercion.”

 

Almost as free, by that definition, as elections in Soviet times when the vote tended to be even closer to 100 percent. 

 

The voting, by the way, according to the report, “took place against a background of the enforcement bodies’ operation by the Kyiv authorities during which tanks and artillery are being used and peaceful civilians are dying.”

 

Presumably the turnout would have been even higher if the Kyiv authorities were not using heavy artillery against civilians.

 

The chief players, as well as the Russian media, took care over every aspect of the performance. Nothing was said to imply more than “support” for Russia. Even Viacheslav Ponomarev, the self-styled “people’s mayor” of Slovyansk, looked almost respectable, though he remains too candidly thuggish to be safely allowed near a microphone. This time, after stating that their next step would be the creation of a Donetsk People’s Republic, which could join Russia’s Customs Union if it gains independence, Ponomarev got carried away.

 

“Russia is our brother. With Russia we have full interaction, including entry into the Customs Union,” Ponomarev said. He added that no decision on asking for the Donetsk region to become part of Russia has been made.

 

“If this is needed, then we can hold any elections, any referendum within three days,” he said.

 

Given the reluctance shown by Western countries to take real and painful measures, that may not prove an exaggeration. 

Halya Coynash is a journalist and member of the Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, on whose website this commentary originally appeared.

back  |  printBookmark and Share

TOL PROMOTION

Call for Videos: Where Have the Winds of Change Blown You?

For most people in TOL’s coverage regions, life changed fundamentally 25 years ago. For good or ill, they are leading lives few could have anticipated before the fall of communism or the Berlin Wall.

We’d like to hear some of those stories. We’re looking for short videos of your reminiscences or of how you’ve fared since. Of your triumphs or disappointments. How have the events of late 1989 shaped your life? Click here for more information and submissions guidelines.

DEADLINE - November 24, 2014.

RELATED ARTICLES

© Transitions Online 2014. All rights reserved. ISSN 1214-1615
Published by Transitions o.s., Baranova 33, 130 00 Prague 3, Czech Republic.